From 056505d89fb63d3a748b91a4b6c12ce83dccb9a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LukeMathWalker <20745048+LukeMathWalker@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:10:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] It's enough for one field to be private. Closes #69

---
 book/src/03_ticket_v1/05_encapsulation.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/book/src/03_ticket_v1/05_encapsulation.md b/book/src/03_ticket_v1/05_encapsulation.md
index 17c249d..55557e4 100644
--- a/book/src/03_ticket_v1/05_encapsulation.md
+++ b/book/src/03_ticket_v1/05_encapsulation.md
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ To enforce stricter rules, we must keep the fields private[^newtype].
 We can then provide public methods to interact with a `Ticket` instance.
 Those public methods will have the responsibility of upholding our invariants (e.g. a title must not be empty).
 
-If all fields are private, it is no longer possible to create a `Ticket` instance directly using the struct
+If at least one field is private it is no longer possible to create a `Ticket` instance directly using the struct
 instantiation syntax:
 
 ```rust