From e732ea82e4f1a712858e61bc3836c102b4f1191e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mckzm <134839822+mckzm@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 22:03:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Fix minor typo in 09_bounded.md (#125)

Trim errant `s` from `enqueue`'s end in [Bounded vs unbounded channels](https://rust-exercises.com/100-exercises/07_threads/09_bounded.html):

`if the producers enqueues messages` -> `if the producers enqueue messages`
---
 book/src/07_threads/09_bounded.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/book/src/07_threads/09_bounded.md b/book/src/07_threads/09_bounded.md
index 16c62c7..af20cc8 100644
--- a/book/src/07_threads/09_bounded.md
+++ b/book/src/07_threads/09_bounded.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 So far we've been using unbounded channels.\
 You can send as many messages as you want, and the channel will grow to accommodate them.\
 In a multi-producer single-consumer scenario, this can be problematic: if the producers
-enqueues messages at a faster rate than the consumer can process them, the channel will
+enqueue messages at a faster rate than the consumer can process them, the channel will
 keep growing, potentially consuming all available memory.
 
 Our recommendation is to **never** use an unbounded channel in a production system.\